By Michael Gerson, in The Washington Post
Just to be on the safe side, voters in Oklahoma this month overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment that prevents the Talibanization of the Sooner State. Henceforth, there will be no public stonings in Ponca City, no forced burqa wearing in Bartlesville, no sharia law in Lawton.
Even supporters of the referendum – which forbade state courts from considering sharia in their deliberations – admitted that the threat from Oklahoma’s 30,000 Muslims couldn’t be called “imminent.”
“It’s not a problem and we want to keep it that way,” explains state Sen. Anthony Sykes. Sharia law, according to state Rep. Rex Duncan, is a “cancer that must be removed with a preemptive strike.”
This is a novel use of American law – not to actually address a public problem but to taunt a religious minority. The Oklahoma amendment purports to “Save Our State” from disputed practices and beliefs within Islam. But the precedent reaches more broadly. Perhaps San Francisco could declare itself a “crusade-free zone,” just in case some of those intolerant Catholics are reading Urban II. If they resist being singled out, they must be pro-crusade. Or maybe Congress should pass a constitutional amendment forbidding suttee – the historical practice of widow burning – just to put Hindus on notice. It’s not a problem, but, hey, we want to keep it that way.
![[rss]](http://religioninsociety.com/wp-content/themes/k2_1.0.3/images/feed.png)
We are very pleased to welcome the participation of Wendy Doniger, University of Chicago Divinity School, Chicago, USA to the 2011 Religion and Spirituality in Society Conference as a keynote speaker.
From Hemant Mehta, in Friendly Atheist
From 3 Quarks Daily