Monthly Archive for September, 2010

The Dogma Delusion

From Matthew Reisz, in Times Higher Education

The notion of a ‘war’ between science and religion is a media-friendly but profoundly inaccurate model for scholars’ many-hued and nuanced views of God, faith and doubt.

“Arik” is a physicist at a US university. Although he is easy-going on most issues, he regards religion as a form of “intellectual terrorism”, a “virus” to which he has now become “immune”, and he is proud that his children have been “thoroughly and successfully indoctrinated that belief in God is a form of mental weakness”.

Far from being worthy of even grudging respect, religion is to “Arik” simply “garbage – the detritus left over from the age of enlightenment and the scientific revolution”. Its fierce and inevitable struggle with science counts as “the only realization of the battle between good and evil that I know of”.

To read more…

The Meaning of the Koran

15wrightimg-articleinlineBy Robert Wright

Test your religious literacy:

Which sacred text says that Jesus is the “word” of God? a) the Gospel of John; b) the Book of Isaiah; c) the Koran.

The correct answer is the Koran. But if you guessed the Gospel of John you get partial credit because its opening passage — “In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God” — is an implicit reference to Jesus. In fact, when Muhammad described Jesus as God’s word, he was no doubt aware that he was affirming Christian teaching.

To read more…

Religion, Science, and the Humanities: An Interview with Barbara Hernstein Smith

smithbh1By Nathan Schneider, in The Immanent Frame

Barbara Herrnstein Smith is a distinguished literary scholar at both Brown and Duke, who, since her undergraduate days, has had a special interest in the uses and misuses of scientific psychology. Her latest book, which stems from her 2006 Terry Lectures at Yale University, is Natural Reflections: Human Cognition at the Nexus of Science and Religion (Yale, 2009). It explores the ways in which contemporary cognitive science and evolutionary psychology are being called upon to, once and for all, explain religion. Also, don’t miss her contributions to The Immanent Frame’s discussion “A cognitive revolution?

*  *  *

NS: Natural Reflections has been the subject of a lively debate (here and here) on Stanley Fish’s blog at The New York Times. Have you found the exchange productive?

BHS: One-shot retorts, or seesaw exchanges on blogs, are rarely models of intellectually productive discussion, but Stanley Fish’s columns attract thoughtful readers, and I found the responses to his column on Natural Reflections instructive. Two related anxieties were repeatedly voiced on the basis of Fish’s description of my evenhanded—or, in fact, determinedly symmetrical—treatment of religious beliefs and what we take as scientific knowledge. One is that I am flattening out important differences between them. The other is that I’m refusing to take a stand on a major issue of our time, and thus—wittingly or unwittingly—giving aid and comfort to the wrong side.

To read more…

Satisfaction Guaranteed

victoryFrom David Stark, in 3 Quarks Daily

Lights dimmed, spotlights, stroboscopic effects, and loud rock music. The camera on a large boom arm swings toward the audience who can now see themselves, clapping and cheering, displayed on one of the enormous screens above the stage. The warmup act is over and the headline performer bounds onto the set amidst frenzied applause. We are at VictoryChurch.tv, one of several megachurches that I have been studying in Oklahoma City.

To read more…

The Philosopher Who Would Not Be King

jacksonBy Michael D. Jackson, Harvard Divinity Bulletin

The day was hot. Trudging up the long avenue toward the university, I kept to the shade. The figs and eucalypts reminded me of Australia, bark stripped and straggling, or littering the dry ground. The oaks, myrtles, and phoenix palms took me back to the south of France. I imagined that I could feel at home here, this commingling of antipodean, Mediterranean, and American flora, this winterless climate. But the buildings, colonnades, tiled terracotta roofs, and open courtyards were a less congenial mix. Inexplicably, Auguste Rodin’s Burghers of Calais had been made strangers to one another, standing alone rather than grouped as they are in Calais and London, willing hostages prepared to give their lives to save their besieged city. At the entrance to the university there was an inscription dedicating the campus to the memory of Leland Stanford, Jr., “born to mortality. . . passed to immortality,” a mother’s undying love metamorphosed into an institution of timber beam, plaster walls, reinforced concrete, and carved stone.

To read more…

New Speaker for 2011 Religion Conference

Please join us in welcoming Professor George Bond to the group of plenary speakers for the 2011 Religion Conference.

george-bond

George Bond is a professor of Religious Studies at Northwestern University. He specializes in Buddhist studies and the history of religion. He works primarily on Theravada Buddhism studying the textual tradition and the practice of Buddhism in Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia.  He has been a recipient of the Charles Deering McCormick Professorship of Teaching Excellence at Northwestern University.

He is the author of numerous publications including: The Buddhist Revival in Sri Lanka,and Buddhism at Work: Community Development, Social Empowerment and the Sarvodaya Movement.

He has served as president of the Midwest region of the American Academy of Religion and as co-chair of the Buddhism Section of the national American Academy of Religion. He has been an officer and a board member of the American Institute for Sri Lanka Studies.